Versioning Strategies for Micro Frontends
1. Introduction
Versioning in micro frontends is crucial for managing dependencies, ensuring compatibility, and facilitating smooth deployments. This lesson explores effective versioning strategies that can help teams maintain their micro frontend architecture efficiently.
2. Key Concepts
- Micro Frontends: A technique where a frontend application is decomposed into smaller, independently deployable pieces.
- Versioning: The process of assigning version numbers to new iterations of an application or component.
- Semantic Versioning: A versioning scheme that uses a three-part number (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH).
3. Versioning Strategies
3.1 Semantic Versioning
Semantic Versioning (SemVer) establishes a clear and predictable way to version software. The versioning format is MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH.
Increment the MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes, the MINOR version when you add functionality in a backwards-compatible manner, and the PATCH version for backwards-compatible bug fixes.
3.2 API Versioning
API versioning involves creating a new version of the API for each major change. This can be accomplished through URL versioning, request headers, or query parameters.
// Example of URL versioning
GET /api/v1/products
GET /api/v2/products
3.3 Branching Strategies
Use branching strategies in your version control system such as Git to manage different versions of your micro frontends. Common strategies include:
- Feature branching
- Release branching
- Hotfix branching
3.4 Deprecation Policy
A clear deprecation policy helps manage the lifecycle of micro frontend components. Announce deprecations far in advance and provide migration paths.
4. Best Practices
Always use consistent versioning across all micro frontends to avoid confusion and ensure compatibility!
- Document all version changes in a changelog.
- Ensure backward compatibility where possible.
- Use automated testing to validate version compatibility.
- Communicate changes to the team regularly.
5. FAQ
What is the difference between MAJOR, MINOR, and PATCH versions?
MAJOR versions indicate breaking changes, MINOR versions indicate added features that are backward-compatible, and PATCH versions indicate backward-compatible bug fixes.
How do I handle breaking changes?
When introducing breaking changes, increment the MAJOR version and ensure to document the changes clearly for users.