Invent and Simplify: Problem Solved
Situation
At a previous role, our team was responsible for maintaining a legacy microservice that handled image transformations for thousands of user-uploaded assets. The system was complex, relied on multiple chained APIs, and was becoming a performance bottleneck, especially during peak traffic.
Engineers dreaded working on this service. It was fragile, undocumented, and prone to silent failures β yet critical to the user experience.
Task
I volunteered to lead an effort to both stabilize and improve this system. But I didnβt want to just patch it β I wanted to rethink it. My goal was to invent a solution that was simpler, more reliable, and scalable enough to handle future load growth.
Action
First, I audited all failure logs and traced the key bottlenecks. I discovered that 60% of failures were due to a chain of synchronous calls between our transformation API, a third-party image processor, and our CDN invalidation layer.
I proposed a redesigned pipeline based on the following simplifications:
- π¦ Replaced the legacy service with a stateless Lambda function
- π§ Used Amazon S3 event triggers to kick off processing jobs automatically
- πͺ Integrated Sharp.js for image ops β smaller, faster, and self-contained
- π Added structured CloudWatch logging + Datadog metrics for full observability
// Example: AWS Lambda handler
exports.handler = async (event) => {
const file = event.Records[0].s3.object.key;
const image = await S3.getObject({ Bucket, Key: file }).promise();
const resized = await sharp(image.Body).resize(1024).toBuffer();
await S3.putObject({ Bucket: 'output-bucket', Key: file, Body: resized }).promise();
};
I built a working MVP in 3 days and demoed it to my manager. Once approved, I coordinated phased rollout behind a feature flag and ran performance benchmarks in staging.
Result
The simplified architecture reduced processing latency by 85%, cut error rates to near-zero, and required zero manual intervention post-launch. Engineering time spent on this service dropped from ~6 hours/week to under 15 minutes/month. This solution was later adopted by two other teams with similar workloads.
It was cited during my annual review as one of the highest-leverage projects Iβd led that year. I was also asked to present the design at our internal engineering summit.
Reflection
- π‘ Simplicity doesn't mean less β it means fewer moving parts with higher reliability.
- π Invention often starts by asking: "If we were building this today, how would we do it?"
- π I built in observability from day one β which made trust in the new system easier to earn.
- π§βπ€βπ§ Good invention spreads β two other teams adopted the solution without me being involved.
FAQ
How do I balance invention with deadlines?
Invent fast, test fast. I scoped an MVP that solved 80% of the pain first. Only after proving value did I push for a broader rollout.
What if my team resists change?
Involve them early. Share prototypes. Let them see the metrics. Most resistance comes from fear of breakage β reduce that with data and documentation.
Whatβs a sign your solution is too complex?
If it takes more time to explain it than it does to run it β it's probably overengineered. The goal is clarity, not cleverness.