Swiftorial Logo
Home
Swift Lessons
Matchups
CodeSnaps
Tutorials
Career
Resources

Invent and Simplify: Problem Solved

Situation

At a previous role, our team was responsible for maintaining a legacy microservice that handled image transformations for thousands of user-uploaded assets. The system was complex, relied on multiple chained APIs, and was becoming a performance bottleneck, especially during peak traffic.

Engineers dreaded working on this service. It was fragile, undocumented, and prone to silent failures β€” yet critical to the user experience.

Task

I volunteered to lead an effort to both stabilize and improve this system. But I didn’t want to just patch it β€” I wanted to rethink it. My goal was to invent a solution that was simpler, more reliable, and scalable enough to handle future load growth.

Action

First, I audited all failure logs and traced the key bottlenecks. I discovered that 60% of failures were due to a chain of synchronous calls between our transformation API, a third-party image processor, and our CDN invalidation layer.

I proposed a redesigned pipeline based on the following simplifications:

  • πŸ“¦ Replaced the legacy service with a stateless Lambda function
  • 🧠 Used Amazon S3 event triggers to kick off processing jobs automatically
  • πŸͺ„ Integrated Sharp.js for image ops β€” smaller, faster, and self-contained
  • πŸ“Š Added structured CloudWatch logging + Datadog metrics for full observability
// Example: AWS Lambda handler
  exports.handler = async (event) => {
    const file = event.Records[0].s3.object.key;
    const image = await S3.getObject({ Bucket, Key: file }).promise();
    const resized = await sharp(image.Body).resize(1024).toBuffer();
    await S3.putObject({ Bucket: 'output-bucket', Key: file, Body: resized }).promise();
  };
      

I built a working MVP in 3 days and demoed it to my manager. Once approved, I coordinated phased rollout behind a feature flag and ran performance benchmarks in staging.

Result

The simplified architecture reduced processing latency by 85%, cut error rates to near-zero, and required zero manual intervention post-launch. Engineering time spent on this service dropped from ~6 hours/week to under 15 minutes/month. This solution was later adopted by two other teams with similar workloads.

It was cited during my annual review as one of the highest-leverage projects I’d led that year. I was also asked to present the design at our internal engineering summit.

Reflection

  • πŸ’‘ Simplicity doesn't mean less β€” it means fewer moving parts with higher reliability.
  • πŸš€ Invention often starts by asking: "If we were building this today, how would we do it?"
  • πŸ” I built in observability from day one β€” which made trust in the new system easier to earn.
  • πŸ§‘β€πŸ€β€πŸ§‘ Good invention spreads β€” two other teams adopted the solution without me being involved.

FAQ

How do I balance invention with deadlines?

Invent fast, test fast. I scoped an MVP that solved 80% of the pain first. Only after proving value did I push for a broader rollout.

What if my team resists change?

Involve them early. Share prototypes. Let them see the metrics. Most resistance comes from fear of breakage β€” reduce that with data and documentation.

What’s a sign your solution is too complex?

If it takes more time to explain it than it does to run it β€” it's probably overengineered. The goal is clarity, not cleverness.